Mapping International University Partnerships Identified by East African Universities as Strengthening Their Medicine, Nursing, and Public Health Programs

Authors

  • Aaron N. Yarmoshuk University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Anastasia Nkatha Guantai University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mughwira Mwangu Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  • Donald C. Cole DLSPH, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
  • Christina Zarowsky University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa; CR-CHUM/ESPUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2016.07.006

Keywords:

international partnerships, universities, global health, medicine, nursing, public health, capacity building, education, research, service, Africa

Abstract

Background

International university partnerships are recommended for increasing the capacity of sub-Saharan African universities. Many publications describe individual partnerships and projects, and tools are available for guiding collaborations, but systematic mappings of the basic, common characteristics of partnerships are scarce.

Objective

To document and categorize the international interuniversity partnerships deemed significant to building the capacity of medicine, nursing, and public health programs of 4 East African universities.

Methods

Two universities in Kenya and 2 in Tanzania were purposefully selected. Key informant interviews, conducted with 42 senior representatives of the 4 universities, identified partnerships they considered significant for increasing the capacity of their institutions' medicine, nursing, and public health programs in education, research, or service. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed. Partners were classified by country of origin and corresponding international groupings, duration, programs, and academic health science components.

Findings

One hundred twenty-nine university-to-university partnerships from 23 countries were identified. Each university reported between 25 and 36 international university partners. Seventy-four percent of partnerships were with universities in high-income countries, 15% in low- and middle-income countries, and 11% with consortia. Seventy percent included medicine, 37% nursing, and 45% public health; 15% included all 3 programs. Ninety-two percent included an education component, 47% research, and 24% service; 12% included all 3 components.

Conclusions

This study confirms the rapid growth of interuniversity cross-border health partnerships this century. It also finds, however, that there is a pool of established international partnerships from numerous countries at each university. Most partnerships that seek to strengthen universities in East Africa should likely ensure they have a significant education component. Universities should make more systematic information about past and existing partnerships available publicly.

Author Biographies

Aaron N. Yarmoshuk, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

BA, MSc

Anastasia Nkatha Guantai, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

BPharm, MPharm, PhD

Mughwira Mwangu, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

BA, MA, PhD

Donald C. Cole, DLSPH, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

MD, MSc, FRCP(C)

Christina Zarowsky, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa; CR-CHUM/ESPUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec

BSc, MD, MPH, PhD

Downloads

Published

2017-03-08

Issue

Vol. 82 No. 5 (2016)

Section

Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.

Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).